Supreme CourtDivision Bench(2000) 03 SC CK 0031

Mohinder Kumar vs State of Haryana and Another

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 3 March 2000 · Citation: (2001) 1 ACR 392 : (2000) CriLJ 4995 : (2000) 7 JT 438 : (2000) 2 MPJR 283 : (2001) 10 SCC 605

HON’BLE JUDGES
S. Rajendra Babu, J · S. N. Phukan, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Appeal No. 261 of 2000 (Arising out of SLP (Criminal) No. 2320 of 1999)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 224 words
1.

Leave granted.

2.

A Petition was filed before the High Court u/s 482 of the CrPC for quashing the complaint dated 3-2-1999 u/s 7 of the Essential Commodities Act read with Clause 19 of the Fertilizer Control Order.

3.

On an earlier occasion in a similar matter the High Court doubting the correctness of the decision of the Division Bench, the matter had been referred to the Full Bench. On behalf of the appellant, it was brought to the notice of High Court that when the matter was still under consideration and it would be in the fitness of things to await the out-come of the decision in that matter by the Full Bench. However, without awaiting for the out-come of the decision in that matter by the Full Bench, the High Court proceeded to state that so long as ruling of the Division Bench holds the field, the learned single Judge proposed to follow the same decision and decide the matter. We do not think that was the right course adopted by the High Court. We, therefore, set aside the order passed by the High Court and remit the matter to the High Court for fresh consideration in accordance with law. It has also been brought to our notice that the Full bench decision has now been rendered. Appeal is allowed accordingly.