High CourtsSingle Bench(2017) 12 DEL CK 0244

Mohd. Yunus And Ors vs IRCTC

Delhi High Court · Decided on 8 December 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sunil Gaur, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 10928 Of 2017, Civil Miscellaneous No. 44732 Of 2017

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

18 paragraphs · 315 words

Sunil Gaur, J

1.

Twenty three petitioners in this petition are aggrieved by Notification of 3rd November, 2017 (Annexure P-1 colly) vide which filling up of

vacancies through Limited Departmental Competitive Examination (LDCE) in W-6 (scale `8800-20000) is being undertaken by respondent. Vide

impugned Notification of 9th November, 2017 (Annexure P-1 colly) criteria for filling up the vacancies in question has been enlarged.

2.

The grievance of petitioners herein, who claim to be belonging to North Zone, is that after the advertisement of 3rd November, 2017, the criteria for

this examination cannot be modified.

3.

Learned counsel for respondent points out that this examination is being conducted for W-6 category, which is an open examination for all workmen

and if petitioners give their consent, they are eligible to participate in the examination.

4.

Learned counsel for petitioners on instructions submits that petitioner would like to participate in the examination in question without questioning the

validity of the examination, if they are permitted to give their consent to Group General Manager (HRD), North Zone, New Delhi, as most of the

petitioners are present in the Court and the remaining few can send their consent vide e-mail today itself.

5.

Learned counsel for respondent submits that if it is so done by petitioners today itself, then subject to their being eligible, they shall be permitted to

appear in the written examination scheduled to be held on 11th December, 2017, at their respective venues.

6.

The aforesaid stand taken by counsel for respondent is appreciated, as an opportunity to participate in this examination is in spirit of open

examination.

7.

Let the needful be done by both the sides, in terms of stand taken as above.

8.

With aforesaid observations, this petition and application are disposed of.

9.

A copy of this order be given dasti under the signatures of Court Master to counsel representing both the sides.