High CourtsDivision Bench(2018) 05 CHH CK 0185

Mohd. Siddique vs Asha Nadam And Ors

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 18 May 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
Prashant Kumar Mishra, J · Ram Prasanna Sharma, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 1432 Of 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 173 words

Prashant Kumar Mishra J

1.

Heard.

2.

Shri Surfaraj Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner would demonstrate extreme urgency in the matter due to which the petitioner is compelled to prefer the instant writ petition.

3.

Under Section 13 of the Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011 the order under challenge is appealable before the Supreme court. However, the appellant would demonstrate lack of resources for immediately moving the Supreme Court. It is also highlighted that due to ensuing summer vacation, there may be some difficulty in getting the matter listed, therefore, some breathing period may be allowed to the petitioner.

4.

Considering the submission, the writ petition is disposed of with observation that for a period of 6 weeks from today, the order of eviction shall remain in abeyance.

5.

It is made clear that this order shall not be construed to be an opinion on the merits of the case neither it would be permissible for the petitioner to claim equity on the basis of this interim order.

6.

Certified copy today.