High CourtsSingle Bench(2020) 06 CHH CK 0007

Mohd. Junaid Meman vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 26 June 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Prashant Kumar Mishra, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Misc.Criminal Case (Anticipatory Bail) Misc.Criminal Case (Anticipatory Bail) MCRCA No. 370 Of 2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

16 paragraphs · 288 words

@JUDGMENT-JUDGMENT

1.

The applicant has preferred this application for grant of anticipatory bail, as he apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case

No.2357/2019, registered by Learned JMFC, Korba for offence punishable under Section 420 of the IPC.

2.

Applicant granted loan of Rs. 2 Lacs to the respondent No.2. The said respondent repaid Rs.48,000/- and for the remaining amount of Rs.

1,52,000/-, he issued a cheque in the name of the applicant. When the cheque was presented for encashment, it was dishonored, therefore, applicant

has filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The present private complaint case has been filed as a counter blast to the

proceedings initiated by the applicant for dishonor of the cheque.

3.

Learned State Counsel would oppose the prayer for grant of bail. However, no one appears for the objector, despite service of notice and having

appeared before this Court on previous dates of hearing.

4.

Considering the nature of allegation and genesis of the offence, this Court is inclined to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail.

5.

Accordingly, the application is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of the applicant, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on his

executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the arresting officer with the following

conditions:-

(I) he shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

(ii) he shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him

from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer.