High CourtsSingle Bench(2023) 08 DEL CK 1588

Mohd. Iqbal vs BSES Yamuna Power Ltd. & Anr.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 28 August 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajnish Bhatnagar, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
CRL.A.139/2013

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 341 words

RAJNISH BHATNAGAR, J (ORAL)

1.

The appellant has preferred the present appeal under Section 156 of the Electricity Act read with Sections 374 and 482 Cr.P.C for setting aside the impugned judgment dated 21.12.2012 vide which he has been convicted under Section 135 of the Indian Evidence Act whereby he has been sentenced to undergo SI for 8 months along with civil liability of ₹ 3,73,618/-.

2.

During the course of the arguments on 13.10.2022, the parties were agreeable to mediation and it was stated by the learned counsel for the appellant as well as counsel for respondent no. 2 that there are chances of amicable settlement between the parties and they requested that the matter may be again referred to mediation.

3.

Accordingly, the matter was referred to Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre for 01.11.2022.

4.

By virtue of mediation settlement dated 05.04.2023 the appellant and respondent no. 2 settled all their disputes and claims amicably. A copy of the said settlement has been placed on record. I have perused the mediation settlement and as per the mediation settlement respondent no. 1 has received its entire dues i.e. a sum of ₹4,67,023/- as per the Settlement Agreement and respondent no. 1 agreed not to press any criminal liability against the appellant.

5.

Since the matter has been settled amicably before the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre and the claims of respondent no. 1 have been settled, no useful purpose would be served by continuing with this appeal.

6.

Therefore, this is a fit case where this Court deems it appropriate to allow the present appeal to be compounded taking into consideration the settlement between both the parties. Consequently, the judgment dated 21.12.2012 passed by learned ASJ is hereby set aside and the present appeal is allowed as compounded.

7.

The sentence of the appellant has already been suspended and since the appeal has been compounded, bail bonds of the appellant are cancelled and sureties stand discharged.

8.

With the aforesaid observations, the appeal stands disposed of.