High CourtsDivision Bench(2001) 11 UK CK 0010

Mohan Singh Bisht vs State of Uttaranchal and Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 6 November 2001 · Citation: (2002) 2 UC 226

HON’BLE JUDGES
P.C.Verma, J · Mahesh Chand Jain, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 891 (M/B) of 2001

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 160 words

P.C. Verma and M. C. Jain, JJ.—The grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that even after negotiation, the petitioner has not been given work order for the work to be executed by him for the Public Works Department.

2.

The negotiation further took place between the petitioner and the Superintending Engineer, P.W.D., Pithoragarh. The Superintending Engineer asked the petitioner for the execution of work, if the petitioner was ready to work at the estimated cost.

3.

After this negotiation, a fresh tender has been issued. It appears that the said negotiation was not acceptable to the higher authorities than that of Superintending Engineer. Therefore, the Superintending Engineer has again issued tender notice. Now in view of the fresh negotiation for the tender, it is open for the petitioner to participate in the process and if his bid is accepted, he will work. Therefore, the grievance of the petitioner is misconceived.

4.

The writ petition is dismissed accordingly.