High CourtsSingle Bench(2002) 07 P&H CK 0070

Mohan Lal Ex. Liquidator of the Jamiatpura Dheru, Co-operative Joint Farming Society Ltd. vs The Jamiatpura Co-operative Joint Farming Society Ltd.

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 4 July 2002 · Citation: (2002) 4 RCR(Civil) 826

HON’BLE JUDGES
Amar Dutt, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 1624 of 1981

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 355 words

Amar Dutt, J.—In an execution application filed by the Jamiat-pura Co-operative Joint Farming Society Ltd., a sum of Rs. 8171,45 was sought to be recovered on the basis of a certificate issued u/s 63(a) of the Punjab Cooperative Societies Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"). The execution application was opposed by the petitioner on various grounds, all of which need not be adverted to in this judgment. The objections were dismissed by the Senior Sub Judge, Ferozepur, Sohan Lal, Judgment-debtor has come up in revision to assail the aforesaid order on various grounds.

2.

During the course of arguments, Mr. Ravinder Chopra, the learned counsel for the petitioner, confined the challenge only to one ground, namely, that the executing Court has erred in law when it authorised the recovery of a sum of Rs. 8171.45 a a perusal of the certificate issued u/s 63(a) of the Act indicates that the award passed against the petitioner was confined to the recovery Rs. 3750/- and no order regarding recovery of interest thereon had been passed.

3.

1 have gone through the record of the case with the assistance of the learned counsel and on perusal thereof, it is evident thatthe certificate u/s 63(a) of the Act, on the basis of which execution proceedings had been initiated against the petitioner, shows that the recovery of of only Rs. 3750/- has been ordered and there is nothing in the certificate from which it could be inferred that the amount so decreed was to be recovered alongwith interest and costs of litigation. Since the certificate, which become executable as a decree of the Civil Court, confines the relief given to the petitioner to a sum of Rs. 3750/- only, the respondent was entitled to recover the amount contained in the certificate alone. As a matter of fact there is also nothing in the impugned order from which it may be inferred that the petitioner was required to pay Rs. 8171.45.

4.

With this declaration that the amount recoverable by the petitioner is to the tune of Rs. 3750/-, the revision petition has to be allowed and ordered accordingly.