AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and
the learned High Court Government Pleader for the
respondent-State.
The respondent-police have charge-sheeted these
petitioners (accused Nos.1 to 3) and co-accused in their
Crime No.399/2015 in respect of the offences
punishable under Sections 380, 454 r/w Section 34 of
IPC.
The allegation of the prosecution is, on the
night of 03.11.2015, accused Nos.1 to 3 broke open the
door of the house of CW.1 and robbed the valuables and
cash amount from the house. Subsequently, all the
four accused shared the bounty among themselves.
During the course of investigation, the stolen property is
recovered.
As per the submission of the learned HCGP,
these petitioners are involved in identical cases
registered by the Kunigal police. Sri. Chethan B.,
learned counsel for the petitioners clarifies that they
were arrested in Crime No.306/2015 and under body
warrant they were produced in the present case.
However, having regard to the nature of the
allegations, there is no impediment to allow the petition.
Accordingly, the petition is allowed. The
petitioners are enlarged on bail in Crime No.399/2015
registered by the respondent-Police, subject to following
conditions:
(i) They shall execute a self bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- each with one surety for the likesum to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. The sureties shall produce their Aadhar Card/Identity Card and the original title deed pertaining to their immovable property for perusal of the Court. The sureties shall not have the history of offering surety to the accused persons of any other criminal case. (ii) They shall attend the Court on all hearing dates regularly and punctually; (iii) They shall not threaten or prevail upon the prosecution witnesses. (iv) They shall not indulge in any criminal activities.