High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 07 MP CK 0213

Mohammad Shahnawaz Khan vs State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 29 July 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anjuli Palo, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.37071 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

22 paragraphs · 434 words

Anjuli Palo, J

This is the first application filed by the applicant under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. seeking anticipatory bail. The applicant is apprehending his arrest in

connection with Crime No.113/2019 registered at Police Station-Jahangirabad, District- Bhopal for the offence punishable under Sections 307, 147,

148, 149 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code.

As per prosecution case, on 09.02.2019 in the afternoon, some dispute arose regarding contract of fish of Kaliyasaut Dam between the parties and

one Mohammad Sageer who is leader of opposition of Municipal Corporation, Bhopal was assaulted. The applicant who is a news reporter in Bhopal

Metro Channel had called the complainant for interview. The complainant along with his niece reached Lilley Talkies in the evening for that purpose.

At that juncture, co-accused Jugnu and Akbar armed with sword, baseball bat, etc. came to there and assaulted the complainant. The complainant

received grievous injuries and hospitalised to various places and availed treatment. Involvement of the applicant is based on criminal conspiracy thus

offence under Section 120-B of the IPC has been registered against him along with other offences.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and falsely implicated in the matter. There is absolutely no material on record

to implicate the applicant in the conspiracy. He was merely covering the news of the incident that had taken place in the earlier part of the day. There

is no evidence to show that the applicant abated or aided the co-accused persons to commit offence. In view of the aforesaid, prayer is made to

enlarge the applicant on anticipatory bail.

Learned Panel Lawyer for the State has strongly opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail. It is submitted that in the year 2011 a case under Section

420 of the IPC was also registered against the applicant.

Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case and looking to the nature of offence and role attributed to the applicant, without

commenting on the merits of the case, the application is allowed. It is directed that in the event of arrest, applicant Mohammad Shahnawaz Khan shall

be enlarged on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/-(Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with one surety in the like amount to the

satisfaction of the arresting officer for his appearance before him during the course of investigation or before the trial Court, during trial, as the case

may be. It is further directed that the applicant shall abide by all the conditions as enumerated under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

Accordingly, the M.Cr.C. is allowed and disposed of.