High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 01 J&K CK 0020

Mohammad Qadeer Paswal And Another vs Union Territory Of J&K And Others

Jammu And Kashmir High Court · Decided on 15 January 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjay Dhar, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 62 Of 2021, CM No. 183, 184 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

28 paragraphs · 566 words

Instant application, seeking extension of time for annexing/depositing the requisite court fee, affidavits and other requisite documents with this petition,

in view of the grounds urged therein, is allowed. The petitioner shall deposit the requisite court fee with the Registry of this Court within a period of

one week from the date of announcement of lifting of lockdown on account of Covid-19 by the Government.

Application stands disposed of.

Through the medium of instant petition, the petitioners are seeking a direction to the respondents to provide sufficient security keeping in view the

threat perception to the life of the petitioners. A further direction is sought to dispose of the representation which is appended as Annexure “P5â€

with the instant petition.

It is the case of the petitioners that petitioner No. 1 is a Panch of Panchayat Gohalan, Uri and the petitioner No.2 is a nominated Sarpanch on ticket of

Jammu and Kashmir Pradesh Congress Committee. It is averred that the petitioner No.1 was attacked by some unscrupulous elements for being

associated with the Congress Party and in this connection an FIR No. 108/2020 dated 01.08.2020 registered with Police Station, Uri was also lodged

against the attackers including private respondents to the instant petition. The petitioners have highlighted a number of other incidents and

circumstances to buttress their contention that their life is under threat from anti national elements. The grievance of the petitioners is that they are not

being provided with adequate security by the respondents despite petitioner No.1 having submitted a representation before His Excellency the

Lieutenant Governor of Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir.

It is a settled law that so far as the security of an individual including a political worker is concerned, the same is to be enhanced or downgraded

having regard to the threat perception of the individual. For assessing the threat perception of an individual, the security agencies of the government

conduct a periodic review and take appropriate steps in accordance with recommendations of security review committee. This Court in exercise of its

writ jurisdiction cannot direct the Government of Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir to provide a particular level of security to an individual. The

level of security to be provided to a political worker is the sole domain of the security agencies. However, it is the constitutional obligation of the State

to protect the life and liberty of the citizens. The security agencies are, therefore, duty bound to protect the life of the petitioners, who are facing a

genuine threat to their life. The matter regarding security of the petitioners, therefore, deserves to be considered by the respondents with all

seriousness.

In view of the above, the petition is disposed of, with a direction to the respondents to make a assessment of threat perception to the life of the

petitioners and while doing so, the respondents shall consider the facts and circumstances highlighted by the petitioners in the instant petition, a copy

whereof shall be provided by the petitioners to the respondents. A decision regarding level of security to be provided to the petitioners in accordance

with the report of the security review committee shall be taken by the respondents expeditiously preferably within a period of one month from the date

a copy of this order along with a copy of the petition is made available by the petitioners to the respondents.

The petition stands disposed of.