High CourtsSingle Bench(2024) 03 MAD CK 0035

Mohamed Nibash @ Mohamed Rifas vs State

Madras High Court · Decided on 8 March 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
G.Ilangovan, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Original Petition (MD) No. 3334 Of 2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 360 words

G.Ilangovan, J

1.

The petitioner is Accused No.5, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 04.04.2022, for the offences punishable under Section 8(C), 20(b)(ii)(C), 25 and 29(1) of NDPS Act, 1985 in Crime No. 6 of 2021, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2.

The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant is working as Inspector of Police, Q Branch. They were in their routine Special duty on 01.03.2023 at about 10 p.m., they received a secret information that some people are trying to smuggle contraband to Srilanka, in an ambulance. Along with the police team, they were on surveillance near Thopputhurai Railway station. On the second day, i.e., on 02.03.2023, at about 5 a.m., a tempo traveller ambulance was intercepted by the police team. At that time, on search, four persons were found available in the above said vehicle. They disclosed their names as Mahesh, Vicky @ Vignesh, Sundar and Rajkumar. When search was made, they found in possession of Ganja weighing about 28 kilograms and further procedure was undertaken as per the procedure and rules. All the four persons were arrested on the spot and remanded to custody and ever since they were in custody. During the course of enquiry, the involvement of this petitioner also came to light. Based upon which, he was also included in the crime and arrested and remanded to custody on 04.04.2022. Seeking bail, this petitioner has been filed stating that a false case has been foisted against the petitioner and he is not involved in the above said occurrence.

3.

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the matter is pending before the trial Court for examination of witnesses. He further submitted that the earlier petition filed by the petitioner for bail, was dismissed by this Court.

4.

In the above circumstances, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the concerned Court for bail instead of filing repeated petitions before this Court. The trial Court may consider the petitioner's bail petition, without being influenced by the order passed by this Court in the earlier occasion.

5.

With this observation, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.