High CourtsSingle Bench(2019) 07 MAD CK 0029

Mohamed Faizal vs Deputy Superintendent Of Police & Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 5 July 2019

HON’BLE JUDGES
T. Krishnavalli, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Appeal (MD) No. 275 Of 2019

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 472 words

T. Krishnavalli, J

1.

Heard Mr.M.Suresh, learned counsel appearing for the appellant, Mr.A.P.G.Ohm Chairma Prabhu, learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the first and second respondents and the third respondent who appeared in person.

2.

This Criminal Appeal has been filed to set-aside the order dated 18.06.2019 made in Cr.M.P.No.1453 of 2019 on the file of the Principal Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai and enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection with the case in Spl.S.C.No.39 of 2018 on the file of the Principal Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai.

3.

The Appellant, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 09.06.2019, for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 294(b), 341, 323 of IPC., and Section 3(1)(x) of SC/ST Act, 1989, in Crime No.131 of 2008, on the file of the respondent police, seeks appeal bail.

4.

The learned counsel appearing for the appellant would submit that the appellant has been falsely implicated in this case and the appellant is in custody from 09.06.2019 onwards.

5.

The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) appearing for the respondent police, on instructions, would submit that the appellant herein is arrayed as A3. He would further submit that if the appellant/accused is released on bail, he will tamper with the prosecution witnesses and hamper the investigation and therefore, he objected to grant bail to the appellant.

6.

The third respondent who appeared in person has no objection to grant bail to the appellant.

7.

Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the appellant is in custody from 09.06.2019 onwards, this Court is inclined to allow the Criminal Appeal by setting aside the order, dated 18.06.2019, passed in Cr.M.P.No.1453 of 2019, by the Principal Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai.

8.

Accordingly, the Criminal Appeal is allowed and the order, dated 18.06.2019, passed in Cr.M.P.No.1453 of 2019, by the Principal Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai, is set aside. The appellant is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties each, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Principal Sessions Judge (PCR) Court, Pudukkottai, and on further condition that:

[a] the appellant shall appear before the learned Principal Sessions Judge (PCR) Court, Pudukkottai, daily twice i.e., at 10.30 a.m. and 5.00 p.m. until further orders;

[b] the appellant shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

[c] the appellant shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the appellant in accordance with law, as if the conditions have been imposed and the appellant released on bail by the Trial Court itelf as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].