AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
SYED M.FAZAL ALI, J.-This appeal has been filed under the provisions of the Supreme court (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, 1970. The appellant has been convicted by the High court under S. 302 and 364 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to imprisonment for life and rigorous imprisonment for 1 years respectively. Both the sentences were directed to run concurrently. The trial court had acquitted the accused of the charges framed against him. In an appeal filed by the State the High court reversed the order of acquittal passed by the Sessions Judge and the appellant was convicted as indicated above.
We have gone through the judgment of the High court and that of the Sessions Judge. The High court has discussed the evidence and catalogued various circumstances which conclusively prove the guilt of the appellant. The Sessions Judge seems to have rejected the prosecution case on general grounds like, e.g., the witnesses were interested and belonged to a particular caste and has not cared to consider the intrinsic merits of the evidence. The High court has effectively displaced all the important reasons given by the Sessions Judge in support of the acquittal and has come to the conclusion that the prosecution case has been fully proved.
After having gone through the judgment of and the evidence referred to by the High court we find ourselves in entire agreement with the view taken by it. There is no merit in this appeal which is accordingly dismissed.