High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 11 MAD CK 0053

M.Mohamed Jakaria vs District Collector, Madurai District Collector Office And Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 11 November 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dr Anita Sumanth, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (MD) No. 1498 Of 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

17 paragraphs · 798 words

Anita Sumanth, J

1.

Heard, Mr . D . Selvanayagam, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.K.S.Selvaganesan, learned Government Pleader appearing for the first respondent/State.

2.The petitioner has sought a Mandamus, directing the first respondent to dispose his representation dated 29.12.2017, allowing him to re-join duty to the post of Village Panchayat Secretary/Clerk. The Mandamus as sought for is not liable to be granted for the simple reason that the representation dated 29.12.2017 has been only filed before the second respondent and thus, the question of directing the first respondent to dispose the same, does not arise.

3.That apart, the case of the petitioner is that though he sought voluntary retirement on 29.12.2017 before the first respondent, the request has not been considered and accepted and thus the petitioner believes that he must be permitted to re-join the same post or be furnished employment in any other equivalent vacancy.

4.

Per contra, the second respondent has filed counter along with a compilation of documents dated 25. 04.2016 enclosing a copy of the Resolution passed by the Sakkimangalam Village Panchayat C o u n c i l i n R e s o l u t i o n N o . 1 3 d a t e d 2 5 . 0 4 . 2 0 1 6 . T h e p e t i t i o n e r w o u l d contest the Resolution on the ground that the same has not been served upon him, whereas, learned Government Pleader appearing for the first respondent would counter that there is no necessity for such service, since the Resolution only records the acceptance of the petitioner's request.

5.Be that as it may, seeing as the prayer is only for disposal of the representation dated 29.12.2017, and the representation is itself nothing more than a mercy petition, it would suffice that Mr.K.S.Selvaganesan, learned Standing counsel for the first respondent is directed to get instructions in regard to the vacancies, if any, in the post of Village Panchayat Secretary/Clerk and report to this Court. Cost of Rs.2,000/- is imposed upon learned counsel appearing for the petitioner payable to Advocate's Welfare Fund. Proof be filed prior to 11.11.2021.

2.

In compliance with the abovesaid order, cost has been paid and memo is placed on record.

3.

Today, Mr.K.S.Selvaganesan, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State would confirm vide written instruction in Na.Ka.No.233/2018/T7 dated 10/11/2021 that there are two(2) vacancies for the post of Village Panchayat Secretary/Clerk in Panaikulam and Karcheri, for which, the petitioner may be considered, if he is otherwise qualified.

4.

He circulates a copy of the Tamil Nadu Village Panchayat Secretaries (conditions of Service) Rule 2013, which deals with the appointment of Village Panchayat Secretary. Rule-3 deals with 'Appointment', and Clause-3 is extracted below:

3.Appointment (1) Appointment to the post of Village Panchayat Secretary shall be made by direct recruitment though Employment Exchange:

(2) The Personal Assistant (Development) to the Collector shall call for a list of suitable candidates from the District Employment Office for appointment to the post of Village Panchayat Secretary duly indicating the qualifications and the name of the Village Panchayat (3) The District concerned shall be the unit for applying as per law orders in force in the State for appointment on the basis of communal/women reservation for the post of Village Panchayat Secretary.

(4) A Village Panchayat Secretary shall be appointed through the Appointment Committee consisting of Personal Assistant (Development) to the Collector the Assistant Director (Panchayats) and the Block Development Officer (Village Panchayats) of the Block Concerned.

5.

Sub Rules (1) and (2) of Rule 3 are not relevant in this case as this is not a case of original or direct appointment, but rather, a case of re-employment to a post that the petitioner was holding till recently.

6.

Thus, all that is needed is to direct the Appointments Committee envisaged under Rule 3(4) to consider the appointment of the petitioner to the post of Village Panchayat Secretary upon his making a suitable application. To this effect, the petitioner is permitted to make an application to the Appointments Committee within a period of three(3) weeks from today.

7.

Upon receipt of the aforesaid application, the Appointments Committee, comprising the Personal Assistant (Development) to the Collector, the Assistant Director (Panchayats) and the Block Development Officer (Village Panchayats) of the concerned blocks, shall consider the application, call upon the petitioner for details, if required, and consider his appointment in one of the two available vacancies, favourably, upon condition that the petitioner holds the requisite qualifications.

8.

Let the aforesaid exercise be completed within a period of four(4) weeks from date of receipt of the petitioner's application.

9.

This Writ Petition stands disposed with the above directions. No costs.