AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
By way of this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking
directions to the respondent-Municipal Corporation, Udaipur, not to
reject the e-bid submitted by it pursuant to e-bid notice No.2016-
17/E-03 dated 6.5.16, if the petitioner is found eligible for award
of the work.
The relevant facts are that the respondent-Municipal
Corporation issued e-bid notice dated 6.5.16 inviting tenders for
award of operation of the boats in Fatehsagar Lake for
entertainment and for taking the tourists to the Mahakaleshwar
Temple for a period of two years.
The petitioner submitted the tender pursuant to the
aforesaid notice, however, apprehending that the e-bid offered by
it may not be entertained by the Municipal Corporation, Udaipur,
on account of the order issued by the Managing Director,
Rajasthan Tourism Development Corporation (''RTDC'') debarring
the petitioner from participating in the tender process initiated by
the RTDC for a period of three years, the present petition has
been filed.
On 12.7.16, while issuing notice to the respondent-Municipal
Corporation, a coordinate Bench of this Court passed an interim
order in the following terms :
"In the meanwhile, the respondent no.2 shall not refuse to accept the offer of the petitioner while invoking the condition No.37 mentioned in the Terms and Conditions supplied with the E-Bid Notification dated 06.05.2016 (Annexure-7). It is made clear that in case the bid of the petitioner is the lowest amongst all the bidders, the work order shall not be issued in its favour till further orders of this Court."
Pursuant to the interim order passed as aforesaid, the bid
offered by the petitioner was considered by the respondent-
Municipal Corporation and the petitioner being highest bidder and
otherwise eligible has been found suitable for award of the
contract.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner contended that
keeping in view the provisions of sub-section (4) of Section 46 of
the Rajasthan Transparency Public Procurement Act, 2012, where
a bidder has been debarred from participating in any procurement
process undertaken by any procurement entity, the debarring
order shall operate qua the tender process initiated by that
procuring entity only and thus, on the basis of the debarring order
passed by the RTDC, the respondent-Municipal Corporation cannot
debarred the petitioner from participating in the bidding process.
This legal position is not disputed by the learned counsel
appearing for the respondent-Municipal Corporation.
Learned counsel appearing for the Municipal Corporation has
candidly submitted that the petitioner being highest bidder and
otherwise eligible is found suitable for award of the work and the
respondent-Municipal Corporation intends to award the work in
favour of the petitioner.
In this view of the matter, no directions are required to be
issued by this in the present writ petition and the same has
rendered infructuous.
Dismissed accordingly.
The respondent-Municipal Corporation shall be at liberty to
award the contract in favour of the petitioner.
