High CourtsSingle Bench(2012) 05 DEL CK 0210

MK Trivedi vs National Cooperative Consumers Federation of India Ltd.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 11 May 2012

HON’BLE JUDGES
Suresh Kait, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) 4942 of 2011

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 362 words

Suresh Kait, J.—Primarily, objection taken in the counter affidavit filed by the Respondent is that the respondent does not come under the jurisdiction of this Court as per Article 12 of the Constitution. In Para 2 and 3 of the petition, it is stated by the learned counsel that in view of the above judicial indictment, NCCF neither comes under the State Government nor an authority nor an instrumentality of State within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution.

2.

In fact, NCCF was registered way back in 1965 as a Cooperative Society under the provisions of Cooperative Societies Act, 1925. This Act was repealed by virtue of Section 19 of the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act and come in force on 2nd April, 1973. The NCCF conducted to be governed by this Court Act and after 16th September, 1985, while the provisions of Cooperative Societies Act, 1924. The NCCF is a Cooperative Society and it is not governed by any statute. It is a voluntary body formed by the members for the welfare of its members. It is an independent body and according to its by laws, it comes neither under the Central Government, and nor any State Government is responsible for the management, administration and functioning of the NCCF.

3.

This Court by its jurisdiction under Article 226 is an supervisory one and not the appellate authority. The settled law is that the Courts while exercising powers for the jurisdiction for the orders of disciplinary authority do not act as a court of appeal. The Court cannot interfere with the correctness of the charges levelled against the officers nor can go into the details of the reliability of the evidence. The disciplinary and the appellate authority having the fact finding authority have the power to consider the matter.

4.

In view of the above discussion, it is established that the respondent does not come under Article 12 of the Indian Constitution.

5.

In the circumstances and in the interest of justice, liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach the appropriate Forum within a period of eight weeks, for appropriate relief. The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.