High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 07 GAU CK 0106

Mizoram State Legal Services Authority (MSLSA) vs State of Mizoram represented

Gauhati High Court · Decided on 9 July 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
Michael Zothankhuma, J
RESULT
Disposed Off
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 189 Of 2015

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

54 paragraphs · 367 words

Sl.N o,"N a m e of

Post","N o . of

Post",Scale of Pay,Head of Account,"Name of Office & No of

Post created

1,UDC,10,"9300- 34800+4200

GP","2014 - Admin of Justice 00 -

114 - Legal Advisers &

Counsels (3) - Legal Services

Authority 00 - (01) â€" Salary","1.ADR Centre, Aizawl -1

2.ADR Centre, Lunglei -1

3.

DLSA, Aizawl -1 4

DLSA, Lunglei -1 5.

DLSA, Champhai -1 6

DLSA, Mamit -1 7

DLSA, Kolasib -1 8

DLSA, Serchhip -1 9

DLSA, Lawngtlai -1 10

DLSA, Siaha -1

2,LDC,12,"5200- 20200+2400

GP","2014 - Admin of Justice 00 -

114 - Legal Advisers &

Counsels (03) - Legal Services

Authority 00 - (01) â€" Salary","1.ADR Centre, Aizawl -2

2.ADR Centre, Lunglei -2

3.

DLSA, Aizawl -1 4

DLSA, Lunglei -1 5.

DLSA, Champhai -1 6

DLSA, Mamit -1 7

DLSA, Kolasib -1 8

DLSA, Serchhip -1 9

DLSA, Lawngtlai -1 10

DLSA, Siaha -1

3,Group D,8,"IS 4440- 7440+1650

GP",-do-,"1.ADR Centre, Aizawl -

4 2.ADR Centre, Lungle

â€" 4

4,Peon,8,-do-,Do,"1. DLSA, Aizawl -1 2

DLSA, Lunglei -1 3

DLSA, Champhai -1 4

DLSA, Mamit -1 5

DLSA, Kolasib -1 6

DLSA, Serchhip -1 7

DLSA, Lawngtlai -1 8

DLSA, Siaha -1

This is issued with the approval of DP & AR (ARW) vide their ID No. ARW/LJE-4/2016-2017/B-583 dated 31.03.2017 and concurrence of Finance,,,,,

Department vide their ID No. FIN (E) 18/2017 dated 19.04.2017 and also with the approval of the Council of Ministers in its meeting held on dt.,,,,,

18.08.2017.â€​,,,,,

5.

Mr. Victor L. Ralte, counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the above Office Order dated 01.09.2017, the present writ petition can be",,,,,

closed.,,,,,

6.

After hearing the counsels for the parties and on perusal of the Office Order dated 1. 09.2017, this Court finds that the prayer of the writ petitioners",,,,,

has been taken care of by the State respondents. Accordingly, the State respondents are directed to create the 38 posts mentioned in the Office Order",,,,,

dated 01.09.2017 and takes steps for filling up the same in accordance with law at the earliest.,,,,,

7.

Writ petition is accordingly disposed of.,,,,,

8.

The Office Order dated 01.09.2017 is made a part of the record and marked as Annexure ’X’.,,,,,