High CourtsSingle Bench(2023) 11 RAJ CK 0078

Mitha Lal vs State Of Rajasthan

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 22 November 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Garg, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5050 Of 2023

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 296 words

Manoj Kumar Garg, J

This anticipatory bail application has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No.16/2023, Police Station Rajnagar, Distt. Rajsamand for the offences under Sections 420 and 406 of IPC.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this is purely a civil dispute and petitioner had already joined the investigation. Therefore, no useful purpose would be served by sending the petitioner behind the bars for indefinite time. Thus, the petitioner may be released on anticipatory bail.

Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned order.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced at the bar, this Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of petitioner Mitha Lal S/o Shri Champa Lal Mali in connection with FIR No.16/2023, Police Station Rajnagar, Distt. Rajsamand, the petitioner shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- along with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the concerned Investigating Officer/S.H.O. on the following conditions :-

(i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

(ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer; and

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.