Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2025) 09 CAT CK 0469

MES-511192 Sh. Naresh Kumar vs Union Of India Through Secretary, Ministry Of Defence, Government Of India, New Delhi. & Ors.

Central Administrative Tribunal, Jammu Bench, Jammu · Decided on 19 September 2025

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjeev Gupta, Member J · Pragya Sahay Saksena, Member (A)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Original Application No. 61, 1508 Of 2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 474 words

Sanjeev Gupta, Member J

1.

The grievance of the applicant is that despite his medical condition, as is evident from medical certificate annexed in the O.A., the applicant has been prematurely transferred from Udhampur to Leh in terms of order dated 29.04.2025 (Annexure A/1 to the O.A.).

2.

It is submitted by Mr. Ravinder Sharma, learned Sr. Counsel appearing for the applicant that the applicant is suffering from seizures disorder and has been advised by Doctor to avoid high altitudes and cold climate, however, his medical condition has not been considered while issuing the impugned order, which would cause not only hardship to the applicant but also to his family. The applicant vide letter dated 20.06.2025 requested Respondent No. 3 to grant him permission for renewal of his medical through GMC and get himself examined by a Medical Board with respect to his medical condition, but the respondents by virtue of Order dated 13.09.2025 directed the applicant to undergo the medical examination by 20th September, 2025 failing which he would be relieved and movement order would be issued.

3.

Learned Sr. Counsel for the applicant further stated that since, the applicant is willing to undergo medical examination with respect to his medical condition, the O.A. can be disposed of with a direction permitting the applicant to undergo medical examination and thereafter, the respondents be directed to treat a copy of this O.A. as representation of applicant and decide the same keeping in view the medical certificate to be obtained by the applicant. Till such time, the applicant may be protected.

3.

Mr. Raghu Mehta, learned Sr. C.G.S.C. appearing on behalf of the respondents vehemently opposed the prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicant and prayed for sometime to file counter affidavit

5.

Having heard the learned counsels for the parties, we are of the considered view that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the instant O.A. pending and the same can be disposed of with certain directions to the parties.

6.

Accordingly, the O.A. is disposed of, at the admission stage itself, without entering into the merits of the case, with the following directions:-

i. The applicant shall get his medical examination done as per communication dated 13.09.2025 and furnish the same to the respondents within two weeks from today.

ii. On receipt of medical certificate from the applicant, the respondents shall treat a copy of this O.A. as representation of the applicant, decide the same by passing a reasoned & speaking order keeping in view the medical certificate within a period of two weeks thereafter and take a decision with regard to posting of the applicant.

iii. Till then, the respondents shall maintain status quo as it exists on today qua the applicant

7.

With the above direction, the O.A. stands disposed of.

8.

No order as to costs.