High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 06 UK CK 0123

Megha Dabral & Others vs State Of Uttarakhand & Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 25 June 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (S/S) No. 1164 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 330 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

Petitioners are pursuing M.D. Pathology Course in Government Medical College, Haldwani. They want M.D. Pathology Course to be treated as

Non-Clinical/Para-Clinical course for purposes of tuition fee.

2.

By means of this writ petition, petitioners have sought following reliefs:-

(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to consider M.D. Pathology as Non-Clinical/Para-Clinical

Course for the purpose of providing benefit reduced annual fee of Rs .1 Lakh to the petitioners.

(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to refund/adjust any enhanced fee levied from the petitioners in

treating them as a student of Clinical P.G. Course instead of Non/Para-Clinical Course.

3.

Ms. Mamta Bisht, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State submits that M.D. Pathology Course is in huge demand, as services of

Pathologist are needed in every hospital, and these days treatment of a patient begins on the basis of a pathological report. She further submits that

M.D. Pathology Course cannot be equated with Non-Clinical/Para-Clinical Course like M.D. Anatomy, M.D. Physiology, M.D. Biochemistry, M/s

Pharmocology, M.D. Forensic Science and M.D. Community Medicine.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioners have made a representation to the Competent Authority on 26.02.2021, but no decision

has been taken thereupon till today. Learned counsel for the petitioners confines his prayer and submits that petitioners may be permitted to make

fresh representation to the Competent Authority and the Competent Authority be directed to take decision on such representation.

5.

In such view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to make fresh representation to respondent no. 3 â€

Director, Medical Education Department, Dehradun within two weeks from today. If such representation is made within stipulated time, respondent

no. 3 shall consider the same and take appropriate decision, in accordance with law, within a period of six months from the date of receipt of such

representation.