High CourtsDivision Bench(2025) 09 DEL CK 1881

Meeta Singh vs Union Of India & Anr.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 8 September 2025

HON’BLE JUDGES
C. Hari Shankar, J · Om Prakash Shukla, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
W.P.(C) 13698/2025, CM APPL. 56245/2025; W.P.(C) 13699/2025, CM APPL. 56247/2025; CM APPL. 56246/2025 in WP(C) 13698/2025; CM APPL. 56248/2025 in WP(C) 13699/2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 211 words

C. Hari Shankar, J

CM APPL. 56246/2025 in WP(C) 13698/2025 ( for exemption)

CM APPL. 56248/2025 in WP(C) 13699/2025 (for exemption)

1.

Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.

2.

The applications stand disposed of.

3.

These writ petitions pray that a resignation tendered by the petitioners on 30 September 2004 in WP (C) 13698/2025 and on 14 March 2000 in WP (C) 13699/2025 be treated as not having been voluntarily tendered and the petitioners be permitted to rejoin service with attended benefits.

4.

There is no explanation whatsoever for the inordinate delay of over two decades in approaching this Court.

5.

In fact, further, the petitioner in WP (C) 13698/2025 has earlier approached this Court by way of WP (C) 11501/2016 seeking pensionary benefits.

6.

Even at that stage, no grievance was raised with respect to the resignation tendered by the petitioner in 2004.

7.

In the case of the petitioner in WP(C) 13698/2025, therefore, the considerations of constructive res judicata and Order II Rule 2 of the CPC would also come into play.

8.

In such circumstances, we are not in a position to examine these writ petitions on merits.

9.

The writ petitions are accordingly dismissed on the ground of delay and laches without examining them on merits.