High CourtsDivision Bench(1926) 10 MAD CK 0010

Meenakanti Rosayya and Others vs King-Emperor

Madras High Court · Decided on 7 October 1926 · Citation: AIR 1927 Mad 500

HON’BLE JUDGES
Curgenven, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 80 words

Curgenven, J.—The fact that the President of the Bench was among those who thought the accused were not guilty was no reason why, on

their being found guilty by a majority of the Bench, he should not vote on the question of sentence. That being so, his casting vote settled the

sentences at Rs. 25 instead of Rs. 10 and so far as I can see the procedure is doing so was perfectly legal. The criminal revision petition is

dismissed.