High CourtsDivision Bench(2012) 02 CAL CK 0032

Md. Rakiul Hossain and Others vs The State of West Bengaland Others

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 2 February 2012

HON’BLE JUDGES
Subhro Kamal Mukherjee, J · Nishita Mhatre, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
C.O.S.T. No. 1 of 2012

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 274 words
1.

This is an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated December 14, 2011 passed by the West Bengal Administrative Tribunal, in Original Application No. 1130 of 2010.

2.

The writ petitioners applied for selection in the posts of constable/shepoy. There was a selection process and the candidates, who secured minimum marks of 50% (per centum) were included in the panel.

3.

Having regard to the number of vacancies available, the authorities fixed up cut off marks or benchmarks for general category candidates, scheduled caste candidates and other backward classes candidates. The department, also, followed the procedure if two or more candidates obtain the same benchmark, the older among them shall be given employment. The petitioners failed to get benchmarks and, therefore, could not be appointed.

4.

The tribunal, however, disposed of the original application by directing that in view of the available vacancies the writ petitioners should be considered for appointment provided no fresh recruitment process has started.

5.

Mr. Surajit Samanta, learned advocate appearing for the petitioners, is aggrieved because fresh recruit process has commenced.

6.

We do not find any merit in this writ application inasmuch as a panel cannot be kept alive for an indefinite period, particularly, when a new recruitment drive has been initiated.

7.

We, therefore, dismiss the writ application.

8.

However, dismissal of this writ application shall not prevent the writ petitioners to try their luck in the new recruitment process.

9.

We make no order as to costs.

10.

The office is directed to supply xerox certified copy of this order to the applicant, if applied for, on urgent basis.