High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 02 MAN CK 0059

Md. Abdur Rahman vs State Of Manipur & 3 Ors.

Manipur High Court · Decided on 16 February 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ahanthem Bimol Singh, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 109 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 341 words

Heard Mr. HS. Paonam, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner.

Mr. RK. Umakanta, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of all the respondents, hence, no formal notice is called for.

The simple case of the petitioner is that a disciplinary enquiry has been initiated against the petitioner and during the course of the disciplinary enquiry,

the Enquiry Officer submitted a report to the Disciplinary Authority that the charges against the petitioner are not held proved. On receiving the said

enquiry report, the Disciplinary Authority issued the impugned order dated 18.01.2021 to the effect that he is not satisfied with the findings submitted

by the Enquiry Officer and accordingly, appointed a new Enquiry Officer for re-enquiring into the matter.

Relying on the judgment rendered by the Apex Court in the case of

“Vijay Shankar Pandey V. Union of India and Another reported in (2014) 10 SCC 589â€, it has been submitted by the learned senior counsel that

the Disciplinary Authority has no authority or power for ordering re-enquiry against the petitioner only on the ground that he is not satisfied with the

findings submitted by the earlier Enquiry Officer. Accordingly, the learned senior counsel prayed for passing interim order for suspending the

impugned order.

Mr. RK. Umakanta, learned Government Advocate submitted that the respondents needs to file a detail affidavit into the matter and he accordingly,

prayed for granting some time.

As prayed for, list this case again on 16.03.2021.

After hearing the submissions made by the learned senior counsel and on perusal of the judgment rendered by the Apex Court in the case of “Vijay

Shankar Pandey V. Union of India and Anotherâ€​ (supra), this Court is of the tentative view that prima facie case has been made out by the petitioner

for passing an interim order and as an interim measure, it is ordered that the impugned dated 18.01.2021 shall not be given effect to till the next

returnable date.

Copy of this order be furnished to both the counsel appearing for the parties through their respective whatsapp/e-mail.