High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 07 CHH CK 0002

Matuk Kashyap vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 2 July 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Prashant Kumar Mishra, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case (Anticipatory Bail) No. 116 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

17 paragraphs · 303 words
1.

Heard.

2.

This is the second application filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the applicants, who are

apprehending their arrest in connection with Crime No.47/2020 registered at Police Station Hasaud District Janjgir-Champa (CG) for the offence

punishable under Sections 384, 34 of the IPC and Section 7 of the Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955.

3.

As per the report lodged by one Dhwajaram, it appears, his family was out-casted by the Caste Panchayat, in which, the applicants were present. It

further appears there was marital dispute between the son of Dhwajaram and his wife, therefore, meeting of the Caste Panchayat was convened,

wherein, the decision to out-caste Dhwajaram and his family was taken and he was also fined of Rs.10,000/- The offence of extortion has been

registered on this allegation of imposition of fine by the Caste Panchayat.

4.

Considering the nature of allegations, I am inclined to extend the benefit of Section 438 of Cr.P.C. to the applicant.

5.

Accordingly, the application is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of these applicants, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on

each of them furnishing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- with one surety each in the like sum to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer with

the following conditions :-

(i) they shall make themselves available for interrogation by a Police Officer as and when required;

(ii) they shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade

him for disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer.

(iii) they shall not influence the witnesses during pendency of the trial.

Certified copy as per rules.