High CourtsDivision Bench(1908) 11 CAL CK 0015

Mathura Nath Roy Chaudhuri vs Basanta Kumar Chakravarti

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 13 November 1908 · Citation: (1909) ILR (Cal) 510

HON’BLE JUDGES
Mitra, J · Chitty, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 122 words

Mitra and Chitty, JJ.—A preliminary objection has been taken to the hearing of this appeal on the ground that Section 588, Code of Civil Procedure, does not apply to proceedings u/s 106 of the Bengal Tenancy Act. Section 109(A), Sub-section 3, confines the power of the High Court to the hearing of second appeals and not appeals from orders, either u/s 558 or Section 560. In Mothur Chandra Majumdar v. Tara Sunkar Ghose (1903) 7 C.W.N. 440 this Court declined to allow an appeal from an order u/s 562, Code of Civil Procedure, made by a special Judge exercising the powers given to him by Section 109(A). The same principle also applies to this case. We accordingly dismiss this appeal with costs.