High CourtsSingle Bench(2019) 04 DEL CK 0107

Master Rudransh Vyas (Minor) & Anr vs Employees State Insurance Corporation & Ors

Delhi High Court · Decided on 16 April 2019

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manmohan, J
RESULT
Disposed Off
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 7730 Of 2016, 8474 Of 2017, Civli Miscellaneous Application No. 31910 Of 2016

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 257 words

Manmohan, J

1.

Present writ petition has been filed by Master Rudransh Vyas. As the petitioner No.1-patient is suffering from Gaucher disease Type-1, he seeks extension of medical cover for life saving Enzyme Replacement Therapy on the ground that his father is insured with Employees State Insurance Corporation (for short 'ESIC').

2.

In the present writ petition, it has been averred that ESIC had denied medical treatment to the petitioner relying on Clauses 5.1 and 5.3 of the ESIC Decisions on Medical Services-July, 2014 inasmuch as it imposes a ceiling limit of Rs.10 lacs per beneficiary per year.

3.

During the pendency of the present writ petition, the impugned Clauses 5.1 and 5.3 have been amended by way of Circulars dated 07th November, 2016 as well as 15th December, 2016 and Office Memorandum dated 29th October, 2018. By way of Circular dated 17th November, 2018, it has been stipulated that for all the cases where expenditure incurred/to be incurred is more than Rs.10 lacs per beneficiary, the same shall be examined on case to case basis by a Committee constituted by ESIC Headquarter office and a decision with the approval of Chairman ESI Corporation shall be taken.

4.

Learned counsel for respondent-ESIC states that the petitioner's case has been found eligible for treatment and the petitioner is being administered medical treatment, including Enzyme Replacement Therapy, as recommended by the Doctors.

5.

Consequently, respondent-ESIC is directed to grant medical treatment to the petitioner.

6.

With the aforesaid direction, the present writ petition and pending application stand disposed of.