High CourtsDivision Bench(1908) 08 BOM CK 0009

Manubai Yamunabai vs Sakhubai Keshav Ramchandra

Bombay High Court · Decided on 25 August 1908 · Citation: 2 Ind. Cas. 484

HON’BLE JUDGES
Heaton, J · Chandavarkar, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 159 words
1.

It is not clear from the judgment of the learned District Judge whether Sections 7 and 39 of the Guardians and Wards Act were present to his mind. Section 7 makes a distinction between appointing a guardian and declaring a person to be one. A guardian is declared when, for instance, he has been appointed under some independent instrument such as a will. By the declaration the Court merely gives effect to the appointment. In the case of guardian so declared the Court may hold him incompetent and remove him from the guardianship on any of the grounds specified in Section 39.

2.

We think, therefore, that we cannot accept the decision of the District Judge. We must reverse his order and send the case back in order to enable him to dispose of the petitions on the merits and with due regards to Section 39 of the Guardians and Wards Act.

3.

Costs to abide the result.