High CourtsSingle Bench(2024) 01 MAD CK 0037

Mansur Ali vs State

Madras High Court · Decided on 9 January 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
C.V.Karthikeyan, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Original Petition No. 27933 Of 2023

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 364 words

C.V.Karthikeyan, J

1.

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 19.10.2023 for the offences registered under Sections 363 of IPC and 6 of POCSO Act, 2012, in Crime No.237 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2.It is the case of the prosecution that the petitioner and yet another accused had taken away the victim child and later, she was traced.

3.The learned Public Prosecutor (Puducherry) stated that the statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C have been recorded from the victim child. The other accused had now been arrayed as witness by the prosecution. The investigation has been completed and charge sheet has also been filed on 12.12.2023.

4.Taking that factor into consideration and the period of incarceration, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions:

5.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Fast Track Court Exclusive to deal with offences under the POCSO Act, Puducherry, and on further conditions that:-

[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b]the petitioner shall report before the Fast Track Court Exclusive to deal with offences under the POCSO Act, Puducherry everyday, till framing of charges and thereafter, during the Court hearing dates.

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.