AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
Sat Pal, J.—This application has been filed on behalf of the applicants who admittedly are not parties to the main petition. In this application, it has been prayed that the order of stay dated 16.4.1996 which was confirmed on 29.4.1996 be vacated. The order dated 16.4.1996 reads as under :
"List the case before the Bench concerned (Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.K. Kapoor) on 29.4.96. Meanwhile, I direct that the learned trial Court shall not pass the final order."
The order dated 29.4.1996 reads as under :
"Admitted. To be listed for final hearing in the month of July, 1996 high up in the list."
Interim order to continue."
After going through the order dated 16.4.1996 and 29.4.1996, I find that these orders were passed after hearing the learned counsel for the parties and as such these orders cannot be modified. The application of applicants who are not parties to the petition is even not maintainable. Even otherwise, I find that the above mentioned order is only with regard to LA Case No. 10 of 1991. According CM stands dismissed.
Civil Misc. dismissed.