High CourtsDivision Bench(2019) 04 AHC CK 0058

Manoj Kumar vs State Of Uttar Pradesh And Others

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 9 April 2019

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vipin Sinha, J · Ifaqat Ali Khan, J
RESULT
Disposed Off
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 9124 Of 2019

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 357 words

Exemption application is allowed.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State.

This writ petition has been filed with the prayer to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned F. I. R. which has been registered as Case Crime No.271 of 2018, under Sections 366, IPC, and 3(2)(v) of SC/ST Act, Police Station Nawabganj, District Kasganj.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the impugned first information report has been lodged by the complainant-respondent containing absolutely false and concocted allegations against the petitioner with the ulterior intention of harassing the petitioner; that the girl is under 20 years of age i.e. 19 years, one month and 6 days as on date; that the matter needs a deeper and fairer investigation before any arrest should be given effect to; that apart from the bald allegations made in the impugned F.I.R., no evidence is forthcoming even prima facie indicating at the complicity of the petitioner in the commission of alleged offence and hence the impugned F.I.R. which is a bundle of lies and motivated by malice, is liable to be quashed.

Per contra, learned A.G.A. has submitted that from the perusal of the allegations made in the impugned F. I. R., it cannot be said that no cognizable offence is made out, hence the impugned F.I.R. is not liable to be quashed.

Having heard the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned first information as well as the other material brought on record, we are not inclined to quash the impugned F.I.R.

However, considering the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties, we dispose of this writ petition with the direction that the petitioner shall not be arrested in the aforementioned case till submission of police report under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C. However, petitioner shall participate and co-operate with the investigation and police authorities shall conclude the investigation within three months from the date of production of certified copy of the order.

With the aforesaid observations, the instant writ petition is finally disposed of.