High CourtsDivision Bench(1910) 12 MAD CK 0025

Mankoothil Chethukutti Nair vs Kalyambath Kunhunni Nair and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 22 December 1910 · Citation: 9 Ind. Cas. 171

HON’BLE JUDGES
Wallis, J · Munro, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 149 words
1.

In this case the lease Under the razinama reserved a right of preemption and pre-mortgage. These reservations are, in our opinion, valid conditions tinder Section 10 of the Transfer of Property Act, as being for the benefit of the lessor and are specifically enforceable against the covenantors and persons claiming under them by a title arising subsequently except in the case of transferees in good faith without notice.

2.

The District Munsif found that the 5th defendant had notice and there was no appeal on this point.

3.

In these circumstances, the plaintiff has rightly been allowed to redeem the 5th defendant''s mortgage; Ashik Ali v. Mathura Kandu 5 A. 187. The second appeal is dismissed with costs.

4.

As regards the memorandum of objections, the decree must be modified by adding that the plaintiff do recover possession on making the required deposit. There will be no costs.