High CourtsSingle Bench(2024) 05 P&H CK 0051

Manjit Singh Sahi vs State Of Punjab And Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 20 May 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vikas Bahl, J
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 11859 Of 2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 355 words

Vikas Bahl, J

1.

This is a civil writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to re-fix the pay and consequent pension of the petitioner on notional basis with effect from 31.03.2010.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for the grievances raised by the petitioner, the petitioner had given a legal notice dated 11.04.2024 (Annexure P-4) and at this stage, would be satisfied in case the legal notice is considered by the competent authority of respondent no.1 in a time bound manner and if after considering the same, in case, the pleas raised by the petitioner are found to be meritorious, then necessary relief be granted to the petitioner.

3.

Learned State counsel has submitted that the competent authority of respondent no.1 would consider the said legal notice and decide the same within a period of three months from the date of the receipt of certified copy of the present order.

4.

Keeping in view the above said facts and circumstances, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority of respondent no.1 to consider the legal notice dated 11.04.2024 (Annexure P-4) of the petitioner and decide the same, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of the receipt of certified copy of the present order and in case, after considering the same, the pleas of the petitioner are found to be meritorious, then necessary relief be granted to the petitioner and in case, the pleas of the petitioner are not found to be meritorious, then a speaking order rejecting the same be passed within a period of three months from the date of the receipt of certified copy of the present order.

5.

It is made clear that this Court has not opined on the merits of the case and the competent authority of respondent no.1 would consider and decide the legal notice independently, in accordance with law and all the issues including issue on delay are kept open.