High CourtsSingle Bench(2011) 01 P&H CK 0077

Manjit Kaur and Another vs State of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 27 January 2011 · Citation: (2011) 2 RCR(Criminal) 319

HON’BLE JUDGES
Alok Singh, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-228 of 2011 (O and M)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 199 words

Alok Singh, J.—This is an application seeking pre-arrest bail in case FIR No. 270, dated 08.12.2010, under Sections 307, 506, 148 and 149 IPC and Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act, registered at Police Station City Rajpura, District Patiala.

2.

Learned Counsel for the Petitioners has vehemently argued that Petitioners are ladies and stated to be armed with gandasi, while as per the medical report, no injury is found from the gandasi on the body of injured.

3.

Learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, on the instructions from the Investigating Officer ASI Darshan Singh, who is present in person in Court, states that there is only firearm injury on the body of the injured, hence, no recovery is to be made from the accused-Petitioners.

4.

Considering totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, present petition is allowed. It is directed that in the event of arrest of the Petitioners, they shall be released on bail on furnishing their personal bonds and one surety of Rs. 20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to the conditions provided u/s 438(2) of the Code. Petitioners shall participate in the investigation as and when they are required.