High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 08 KL CK 0028

Maniyamma vs Thalayindavita Ibrahim Haji

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 2 August 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
P.Somarajan
CASE NUMBER
RP NO. 1044 Of 2019 (D)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 181 words

P.Somarajan, J

It was brought to the notice of this Court that the suit in question was instituted even prior to the commencement of Act 43 of 1995 and that there is

no provision in the Act to deal with any pending suit. The Act has no retrospective effect. Hence, it was submitted that the direction to return the

plaint for consideration by the Wakf Tribunal constituted under the Act cannot be sustained. Inter alia, it was fairly conceded that the said question

was not taken up or brought to the notice of this Court at the time of disposal of the appeal. But, it is a matter pertaining to jurisdiction of the Court and

the Wakf Tribunal and hence the omission, if any, may not have much significance and it would not justify the failure on the part of this court. Hence,

there is a material omission and the same would constitute sufficient reason to review the earlier judgment. The earlier judgment is reviewed and

reason. Post the appeal for final  recalled for the said hearing as per roster.