High CourtsSingle Bench(2022) 01 DEL CK 0051

Manish Bhalla And Anr vs Mridul Gupta

Delhi High Court · Decided on 7 January 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
MAC.APP. No. 324 Of 2021, Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 44173 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

22 paragraphs · 385 words

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J

1.

The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.

2.

Appellants impugn award dated 21.09.2021 whereby the detailed accident report has been allowed and compensation awarded.

3.

Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the Tribunal did not grant an opportunity of final hearing and has erroneously recorded that

arguments were heard and the award has been passed.

4.

Learned counsel submits that the matter was listed before the Tribunal on 18.08.2021 when only the party in person i.e. appellant No.1 was

present. Tribunal recorded that part final arguments heard and thereafter case was adjourned to 06.09.2021 for remaining final arguments, however,

on 06.09.2021 only the claimant was present and the matter was adjourned to 14.09.2021 for the remaining arguments. He points out that on

14.09.2021 no further arguments were heard and matter was simply adjourned to 21.09.2021 for clarification/orders.

5.

Learned counsel submits that though appellant was not present he was not even proceeded ex parte or ex parte arguments heard after 18.08.2021.

Learned counsel submits that however on 21.09.2021 the impugned award has been passed holding that arguments have been heard on behalf of the

appellant.

6.

Clearly there is an error on the face of the record and the Tribunal has erred in holding that arguments have been heard when the arguments even

of the claimant were not concluded.

7.

Accordingly, in view of the above the award is not sustainable and is accordingly set aside. The matter is remitted to the Tribunal for a fresh

decision after granting an opportunity of hearing. Parties shall appear before the Tribunal for directions on 27.01.2022. Tribunal shall endeavor to

thereafter conclude the proceedings within a maximum period of three months from the said date.

8.

It is clarified that this Court has neither considered nor commented upon the merits of the impugned award and the same has been set aside solely

on the ground of lack of grant of opportunity of hearing to the appellants. All rights and contentions of parties are reserved.

9.

The statutory deposit made by the appellants be refunded to the appellants by the Registry.

10.

Appeal is allowed in the above terms.

11.

Copy of the order be uploaded on the High Court website and be also forwarded to learned counsels through email by the Court Master.