High CourtsSingle Bench(2020) 12 MP CK 0162

Manish vs State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 18 December 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Prakash Shrivastava, J
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.51077 Of 2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 368 words

Prakash Shrivastava, J

This is an application made by the applicant under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of bail during trial.

Notice of this application was served on the State counsel. Case diary as per the direction of this Court has been produced and it has been perused.

The applicant is facing trial for offence punishable under Section 49(A) of the M.P. Excise Act, registered with Police Station Mahakal, District Ujjain

in Crime No.810/2020.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that 4.8 liters of illicit liquor stated to be unfit for human consumption has been recovered from the present

applicant. He further submits that no FSL report has been received till now to show that the liquor was unfit for human consumption. He also submits

that the offence is under the Excise Act and that the minimum sentence prescribed for the alleged offence is 2 months, which the applicant has

already completed, as he is in custody since 15.10.2020. He also submits that the investigation is complete, challan has been filed and conclusion of

trial is likely to take time. He has further submitted that applicant is not guilty of the alleged offence and he is not likely to commit any offence while

on bail.

Learned counsel for the State has opposed the application for grant of bail and has submitted that earlier in the year 2015 a case for offence under the

IPC was registered against the applicant.

On perusal of the case diary and considering the circumstances of the case, I find prima facie force in the submissions made by the counsel for

applicant. Hence, I am of the considered view that the application for grant of bail deserves to be allowed and is accordingly allowed.

The applicant is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.35,000/-(Rupees Thirty Five Thousand) with one

surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court for his appearance as and when directed.

The applicant will attend each hearing of his trial before the Trial Court out of which this bail arises. Any default in attendance in Court would result in

cancellation of the bail granted by this Court.