High CourtsDivision Bench(2012) 09 KL CK 0160

Mani vs Philipose and Others

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 27 September 2012 · Citation: (2012) 4 KLJ 506

HON’BLE JUDGES
Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J · A.V. Ramakrishna Pillai, J
CASE NUMBER
F.A.O. No. 231 of 2012

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 187 words

Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J.—This appeal is against an order of remand passed in an appeal u/s 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure. That is an appellate order. An appeal from an appellate order fails among the enumerated powers of Single Judge in terms of Section 3 of the Kerala High Court Act, 1958 - see Section 3(13) (e) of that Act. Therefore, though, as noted in Mary Vs. Pappu, , the Division Bench may have the power to hear any matter in respect of which the powers of High Court can be exercised by a Single Judge, that would not be a routine affair and such appeals have to be listed, normally, before the learned Single Judge dealing with civil appeals in terms of roster.

2.

The Registry will note the aforesaid for future guidance also. This confusion can be avoided if the nomenclature of appeals against remand orders gets an appropriate identity; it could be FAO (RO) or some other appropriate version.

List this matter before the learned Single Judge hearing Civil Appeals as per roster.

This order will gain attention of the Registrar (Judicial).