AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
5 paragraphs · 118 words
1.
It does not appear that there is any dispute between the 2nd defendant and the plaintiff as to which of them is the landholder and the second
paragraph of Section 3(5) of the Estates Land Act does not apply to these cases.
2.
In the absence of any provision to the contrary we are of opinion that the general rule of procedure applies, viz.,-that a person entitled to sue
who refuses to join as a co-plaintiff may be impleaded as a defendant; Pramada Nath Boy v. Ramani Kanta Roy ILR (1907) C. 331.
3.
The decrees of the District Judge are accordingly reversed, and the cases are remanded to him for decision. Costs will abide the result.