High CourtsDivision Bench(1909) 08 MAD CK 0002

Manammal vs The Collector of Trichinopoly

Madras High Court · Decided on 6 August 1909 · Citation: 5 Ind. Cas. 879

HON’BLE JUDGES
Munro, J · Abdur Rahim, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 80 words
1.

The decree for maintenance is a right to future maintenance and u/s 266(l) of the CPC of 1882 cannot be attached. It is not a money decree and

cannot be attached u/s 273 of CPC of 1882, as seems to have been done in this case. Perhaps the proper procedure would be that laid down in

Monessar Doss v. Beer Pratap Sahee 15 W.R. 188. The appeal is allowed and the attachment set aside. There will be no costs.