High CourtsSingle Bench(1993) 01 RAJ CK 0035

Manak Chand and Others vs Municipal Board

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 6 January 1993 · Citation: (1993) WLN 69

HON’BLE JUDGES
A.K. Mathur, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Civil writ Peti. No. 3609 of 1991

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 193 words

A.K. Mathur, J.—Heard learned Counsel for the respondents as counsel for the petitioner is absent.

2.

Petitioner by this writ petition has prayed that the respondents may be directed not to send back the petitioners to the post of Safai Karamchari and the orders Annexs. 1 to 5 be quashed. Petitioners were initially appointed as class 4 employees in the respondent Municipal Board i.e. Safai Karamcharees. Thereafter they were asked to discharge the duties of Naka Guard. The respondent in his reply has submitted that initial appointment of the petitioner was as Safai Karamcharees only and they were posted as Naka Guards. But since the condition of maintenance of the town is deteriorating, therefore, these persons were sent back to work on the post of Safai Karamcharees by withdrawing them and they were asked to discharge the duties of Safai Karamcharees. Since the appointment of these persons was initially as Safai Karamcharees, therefore, there is nothing illegal to send them back to work as Safai Karamcharees and they cannot claim regularisation on the post of Naka Guard

3.

Hence, I don''t find any merit in this writ petition and the same is dismissed.