Supreme CourtDivision Bench(2010) 03 SC CK 0001

Manager, K.V.S.S. Mandawar and Another vs Mukesh Kumar Sharma

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 25 March 2010 · Citation: AIR 2010 SC 3840 : (2010) 5 AWC 5025 Supp : (2010) 125 FLR 320 : (2010) 3 JT 496 : (2010) 2 LLJ 851 : (2010) 2 RLW 1145 : (2010) 2 SCALE 303 : (2010) 12 SCC 487 : (2011) 1 SCC(L&S) 241 : (2010) 4 SLR 475 : (2010) 2 UPLBEC 1532

HON’BLE JUDGES
R. V. Raveendran, J · K. S. Panicker Radhakrishnan, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal No. 2698 of 2010 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 30872 of 2008)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 256 words

K.S. Radhakrishnan, J.—Leave granted.

2.

Notice was issued on the SLP on the limited question of award of full back-wages on reinstatement. Labour Court, Bharatpur vide its award dated 3.4.1996 ordered reinstatement with full back wages when the service of the respondent was terminated without enquiry and without assigning any reasons. The writ petition filed by the appellant was dismissed on 11.5.1999 which was ultimately affirmed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Rajasthan vide its judgment dated 4.3.2008. The said order is challenged in this appeal. Respondent workman then filed an application u/s 33(C)(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 before the Labour Court Bharatpur as LCC 1/2005 for computation of monetary benefits. The Labour Court passed an order dated 3.9.2008 awarding a total amount of Rs. 5,16,032.01 towards back wages. Though the respondent was reinstated in service on 9.6.2005, there is serious dispute between the parties as to whether, the respondent was gainfully re-employed during the period he was out of service. Further it was also stated that the appellant Co- operative Society is not financially sound to meet the claim of full back wages.

3.

Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case and after hearing counsel on either side we feel it would be appropriate to restrict the back-wages to 50% for the period 18.1.1990 (date of termination) to the date of reinstatement. The appellant Society is directed to pay the amount as ordered within a period of three months from today. The appeal is allowed in part accordingly.