High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 02 UK CK 0046

Mamta Rani Kashyap & Another vs State Of Uttarakhand And Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 22 February 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 419 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 229 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

Petitioner is widow of Shri Sandeep Kumar, who was an employee in a private company, namely, M/s Cavendish Industries Ltd. (respondent no.

4). According to the petitioner, her husband died while still in employment on 02.09.2020.

2.

By means of this writ petition, petitioners have sought following reliefs:-

(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding/directing the respondent no. 4 to release Fund, Insurance, Gratuity and

other consequential benefits pending with respondent no. 4 in favour of petitioners with immediate effect.

(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding/directing the respondent no. 1, 2 & 3 to take necessary action against

respondent no. 4 if respondent no. 4 fails to pay the any type of pending dues in regards to Late Sandeep Kumar with him.

3.

According to her own showing, petitioner’s husband was serving in a private company. It is not clear whether petitioner’s husband was

entitled to Fund, Insurance, Gratuity etc., as per his condition of service. Even otherwise also, no mandamus can be issued to a private company and

the remedy of the petitioner lies elsewhere.

5.

In such view of the matter, this Court cannot grant the relief, as claimed. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to

approach the Competent Authority under the relevant statute.