High CourtsSingle Bench(1913) 11 MAD CK 0022

Malaya Pillai Nadan vs Venganan Chetty and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 28 November 1913 · Citation: AIR 1914 Mad 100(1) : 24 Ind. Cas. 764 : (1914) 1 LW 180

HON’BLE JUDGES
Miller, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 189 words

Miller, J

1.

It is contended that this is a suit for an account and so not cognisable by a Small Cause Court. On the plaint the suit is not a suit for an account :

but it has not been decided on the allegation in the plaint but on admission made by the defendant in the trial.

2.

The defendant admitted that he received 45 bags of chillies weighing 189 maunds and sold on the plaintiffs'' behalf 39 bags containing 177

maunds and alleged that the diminution was due to drying. Even if the suit be taken to ho based on a claim for the price of 12 Maunds not remitted

to the plaintiffs, it will not be a suit for an account.

3.

The claim was, therefore, cognizable by the Small Cause Court and on the admission of the defendant that less was sold than was delivered for

sale, he had to show how he had disposed of the balance and the Subordinate Judge has disbelieved his explanation.

4.

I cannot interfere u/s 25 of the Small Cause Courts Act and I dismiss the petition with costs.