High CourtsSingle Bench(2019) 02 CHH CK 0320

Makhan Lal And Ors vs National Highway Authority Of India Ltd. And Ors

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 19 February 2019

HON’BLE JUDGES
Prashant Kumar Mishra, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 411, 413 Of 2019

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

25 paragraphs · 475 words

Prashant Kumar Mishra, J

1.

The petitioners are owners and title holders of the land bearing Khasra No.1472, 1504/3 & 1469 area 0.0320, 0.2550 and 0.1050 hectares situated

at Village Nirtu, Tahsil Takhatpur, Dist. Bilaspur (in respect of Makhan Lal) and land bearing khasra No.461/5, 461/7 & 461/8 area 0.016, 0.008 &

0.016 hectares situated at village Turkadih, Tahsil Takhatpur, Dist. Bilaspur (in respect of Mukeshwar) was acquired for construction of National

Highway.

2.

While assessing compensation payable to the petitioners, multiplier factor of 1 has been applied, whereas, the Division Bench of this Court in WPC

No.1649 of 2017 (Smt. Anita Agrawal Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others) and other connected petitions, has set- aside the Notification dated

4.12.2014, applying multiplier factor of 1 with direction to the State Government to issue fresh Notification indicating the multiplier factors in terms of

the guidelines laid down in the statute and the judgment of the Division Bench.

3.

The following has been held by the Division Bench in paras 10, 11 & 12:-

10.

Further, the question is not about the power of the State Government to issue such notification, the question is the manner in which such power

has been exercised which can also be leveled as mindless exercise of power since by restricting the multiplier of factor to 1.00, the State is obviously

trying to treat all land owners as one. This will deny to the poor land owners of the remote villagers, fair compensation and rehabilitation, which is the

primary object behind the new Land Acquisition Act of 2013.

11.

Drawing analogy from the view taken by the Division Bench of Bombay High Court, which we have quoted with due approval, Court is left with

no option but to strike down the notification dated 04.12.2014 contained in Annexure P/1. A direction is issued that keeping in mind the legal position

which emerges, the State Government will issue a fresh notification indicating the multiplier factors, in terms of the guidelines laid down in the statute

and the judgment.

12.

It goes without saying that all awards and compensations in relation to not only these Petitioners but all such persons whose lands have been

acquired and a multiplier of 1.00 has been used for calculating the compensation, the same will be required to be revised and revisited in light of the

new notification,which is required to be notified by the State Government, on priority.

4.

In view of the above, the present Writ Petitions are disposed of with direction that the petitioners shall move representations before respondent

No.1 within a period of 4 weeks from today. Thereafter, the said authority shall decide the representations within 10 weeks from the date of the State

Government's fresh Notification in terms of the directions issued by the Division Bench.

5.

Accordingly, both the Writ Petitions stand disposed of.