High CourtsDivision Bench(1919) 12 CAL CK 0013

Majaraddin Kabiraj vs Majibar Rahaman Biswas and Others

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 8 December 1919 · Citation: 56 Ind. Cas. 248a

HON’BLE JUDGES
Panton, J · Chatterjea, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 147 words
1.

It seems to us that the learned District Judge did not arrive at an independent finding of his own upon the evidence on the record, but proceeded upon a misapprehension that the Court of first instance had found that the price fetched at the sale was adequate, which was obviously due to a slip of the pan as a reading of the entire judgment will show. The learned Judge apparently did not consider that he was reversing the finding of the Munsif, as he merely says that he saw no reason not to accept the finding of the Munsif. We think that in these circumstances the Judge should come to an independent finding of his own upon the evidence on the record. The case is accordingly remanded to the lower Appellate Court for re hearing of the appeal. Costs, one gold mohur, to abide the result.