High CourtsDivision Bench(1898) 02 MAD CK 0007

Maiden vs Janakiramayya and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 3 February 1898 · Citation: (1898) ILR (Mad) 371

HON’BLE JUDGES
Subramania Ayyar, J · Boddam, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 137 words
1.

Having regard to Ramakrishna Bhikaji v. Bhimabai ILR 15 Bom. 416 we must hold that no stamp duty was payable in respect of the mesne

profits, subsequent to the institution of the suit, viz., for fasli 1305, which profits are comprised in the appeal.

2.

The only contention urged with reference to the merits is that the Subordinate Judge''s conclusion that the plaintiff''s vendor had consented to the

arrangement under which the third defendant held possession is against the weight of evidence. The sole evidence in support of the contention is

that of the third defendant himself. We think the Subordinate Judge was right in declining to accept that evidence for the reasons given by him. We

see no reason to interfere with the order made as to costs.

3.

The appeal is dismissed with costs.