High CourtsFull Bench(1893) 08 CAL CK 0010

Mahomed Bhoy Puddumsee vs Chutterput Singh and Another

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 3 August 1893 · Citation: (1893) ILR (Cal) 854

HON’BLE JUDGES
W. Comer Petheram, C.J · Pigot, J · Norris, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 97 words

Pigot, J.—We think that in this case it is not necessary to call on Mr. Acworth. The principle to be applied is sufficiently expounded by Mr. Justice GIBBS in the case of Mitchel v. Lapage 1 Holt''s Rep. 253.

2.

We think it quite clear that the learned Second Judge of the Small Cause Court is quite right in the view which he takes, and that our answer to the question put by him must be in the affirmative that there is a contract between the parties, for breach of which the plaintiff can sue for damages.