High CourtsDivision Bench(2022) 10 SHI CK 0010

Mahima Devi vs State Of Himachal Pradesh And Others

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 12 October 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sabina, J · Sushil Kukreja, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 5100 Of 2022

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

17 paragraphs · 509 words

Sabina, J

1.

Petitioner has filed the petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking following relief(s):-

“a. Quash/set-aside the result Annexure P-8.

b. Directions to respondents no.1 to 3, to consider the claim of the petitioner and further direction to give her an appointment in GPS Neri Kalan, Edu. Block Dharampur, P.O. Kaba-Kalan, Tehsil & District Solan ,H.P.”

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that now vide Addendum dated 25th August, 2022, Rule-19 has been added to the policy and as per the said rule, appeal can be filed before the Additional District Magistrate (ADM) of the district within 15 days of the selection/appointment. In the present case, selection/appointment of respondent No.8 was made on 18th June, 2022. Hence, the petitioner would not be able to avail the benefit of newly added Rule-19. Learned counsel has further submitted that the petitioner will approach the Additional District Magistrate (ADM), Solan, District Solan, by way of an appeal, within 15 days from today and the same should not be rejected by the competent authority on the ground that it is time barred as the Rule-19 has been incorporated on 25th August, 2022.

3.

Rule-19, provided vide Addendum dated 25th August, 2022, reads as under:-

“ADDENDUM

In partial modification of this Department's Notification No. EDN-C-B(1)2/2019 dated 16th July, 2020 (as updated upto 11th March, 2022), the Governor, Himachal Pradesh is pleased to add "Rule-19 Appellate Authority" in the Part Time Multi Task Workers Policy, 2020 as under:

19.

Appellate Authority:

The appeal in respect of complaints relating to PTMTW selection/appointment etc. should be made to the Additional District Magistrate (ADM) of the district within 15 days of the selection/appointment. The appeal will be considered by the Additional District Magistrate (ADM) of the district and disposed off within 30 days from its receipt with suitable directions. If the complainant is not satisfied with the outcome, then he/she may file an appeal with the Director of Higher/Elementary Education, as the case may be, within 15 days from the decision of the Additional District Magistrate (ADM). The appellate authority may dispose off the appeal within 60 days after hearing the appellant.

By Order

Devesh Kumar, IAS

Pr. Secretary (Education) to the

Government of Himachal Pradesh.”

4.

Keeping in view the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, we deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition by permitting the petitioner to approach Additional District Magistrate (ADM), Solan, District Solan, by way of an appeal, within 15 days from today and the said authority will dispose of the appeal in terms of Rule-19, provided vide Addendum dated 25th August, 2022.

5.

It is clarified that the appeal filed by the petitioner would not be rejected on the ground of delay, but would be disposed of on merits.

6.

Admittedly, so far the appointment letter has not been issued to respondent No.5. Till the decision of the appeal by ADM, Solan, District Solan, appointment letter be not issued to respondent No.5. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.