High CourtsSingle Bench(2022) 01 KAR CK 0039

Mahesh K.N. @ Mahesh Nanjundaswami Kargal vs State Of Karnataka & Others

Karnataka High Court · Decided on 24 January 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
H.P. Sandesh, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Petition No. 98 Of 2022

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

34 paragraphs · 617 words

H.P. Sandesh, J

1.

This petition is filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. praying this Court to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in respect of Crime

No.310/2021 registered by the Davanagere Rural Police Station, Davanagere, for the offence punishable under Section 420 of IPC and Sections 3, 7,

8 and 9 of the Essential Commodities Act.

2.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the respondent-State.

3.

The factual matrix of the case is that the Assistant Agricultural Director - Enforcement II had lodged a complaint on 01.12.2021 stating that in the

lorry, the petitioner was transporting 260 bags of fertilizers and on verifying the same, found 260 bags of fertilizers was being transported and cheating

the farmers. Based on the complaint, the case has been registered for the offence punishable under Section 420 of IPC and Sections 3, 7, 8 and 9 of

the Essential Commodities Act.

4.

The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent and has not committed any offence. The only allegation against

the petitioner is that the fertilizers was transported without any permission or licence and licence was taken for transporting manure of 200 bags and

hence case has been registered and the learned counsel would submit that it does not attract Section 420 of IPC.

5.

Per contra, the learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the respondent-State would submit that, on credible information only they

have seized the vehicle wherein they found fertilizer was transported to the extent of 260 bags and hence the vehicle was seized along with 260 bags

of fertilizers and there is a prima facie case against the petitioner.

6.

Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the respondent-State and having

taken note of the allegations made in the complaint, there is violation regarding transporting of the fertilizers and the permission was taken for

transporting of the manure. Considering the gravity of the offence and the nature of the allegations made in the complaint, it is a fit case to exercise

the powers under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. The petitioner shall assist the Investigating Officer for further investigation.

7.

In view of the discussions made above, I pass the following:

ORDER

The petition is allowed. Consequently, the petitioner shall be released on bail in the event of his arrest in connection with Crime No.310/2021

registered by the Davanagere Rural Police Station, Davanagere, for the offence punishable under Section 420 of IPC and Sections 3, 7, 8 and 9 of the

Essential Commodities Act, subject to the following conditions:

(i) The petitioner shall surrender himself before the Investigating Officer within ten days from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order and

shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs only) with two sureties for the like-sum to the satisfaction of the

concerned Investigating Officer.

(ii) The petitioner shall not indulge in hampering the investigation or tampering the prosecution witnesses.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate with the Investigating Officer to complete the investigation and he shall appear before the Investigating Officer, as

and when called for.

(iv) The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the Investigating Officer without prior permission till the charge-sheet is filed or for a period of

three months, whichever is earlier.

(v) The petitioner shall mark his attendance once in a month i.e., on 30th of every month between 10.00 a.m. and 5.00 p.m., before the Investigating

Officer for a period of three months or till the charge-sheet is filed, whichever is earlier.